Organizations have different focuses for their Project Management efforts.  Two typical focuses are resource management and performance management.  We can define resource management as concentrated at the portfolio level or at the team level.  Performance management is almost always project or program oriented.

From the portfolio/resource perspective we’re typically talking about tools like Oracle Primavera Prosight, Planview, CA Clarity or Microsoft Project Server.  For performance management we can think of Earned Value Management tools such as Oracle Primavera Cost Manager, Deltek Cobra, Deltek MPM, SAFRAN, or Artemis Costview.

In addition to different tools used in this space there are also differences in objectives,  work breakdown, scheduling, statusing, cost collection, Estimate To Complete (ETC) and Estimate At Complete (EAC), and change management.

Some specifics of these differences are detailed below:

Differing Objectives
Resource ManagementPerformance Management
Focuses on resource utilization and optimizationFocuses on achieving cost & schedule commitments
Supply Driven: Attempts to balance resource demand (project needs) with supply (resource capacity) across multiple projects or programsDemand Driven: Generally focused on a single project's resources needed to achieve cost/schedule goals
Tracks all resource work (both project & non-project)Tracks only project work
Differences in Work Breakdown
Resource ManagementPerformance Management
Work Breakdown Structures represent grouping of work (often by project phase)Work Breakdown Structures are decompositions of a product or system (MIL-HDBK-881A standard)
Tasks may exist as different levels of the schedule, and are often summarized in a way that best suits how the PM wants to see the dataTasks rollup to Work Packzges or Planning Packages, which have specific performance measurement objectives, and do not exist outside of these constructs (Some milestones and "duration-omly" events may be exceptions) 
Differences in Scheduling
Resource ManagementPerformance Management
Project schedules represent the effort resources need to be assigned to work onProject schedules represent deliverables, goals, or measurable accomplishments
Schedules are always resource loadedSchedules may or may not be resource loaded
Named individuals are assigned to near-term tasks; future effort may use roles to represent needed skillsA time-phased profile of budget is developed over the duration of the project by Element of Cost (EOC)
Tasks durations vary as needed to model resource commitments (from 1 day to several months)

Task durations vary based on:

  • Predecessor / successor logic required for a good critical path
  • EV method selected
  • EV update / reporting cycle
  • Nature of the work

Differences in Statusing

Resource ManagementPerformance Management
Schedule status driven by individuals with timesheetsSchedule status is independent of timesheets
Work % Complete = Actual Work / Work (AC / EAC)Performance % Complete = EV / BAC
% complete is calculated by actual hours on timesheets

EV is determined by EV Technique

  • 0/100, 50/50, Milestone
  • LOE
  • etc.
Tasks are started when actual hours are reportedTasks are started when work is authorized and effort is expended (Can use timesheets in some cases)
Tasks are completed when all planned work is consumedTasks are completed when objective completion criteria have been met
Differences in Cost Collection
Resources ManagementPerformance Management
Interested in how much time individuals have spent on tasksInterested in how much cost has been incurred for the work performed
Actual cost is usuallly in hours, by individual, by tasksActual cost is usually in dollars (but could be hours), by EOC, by charge # (mapped to a WBS element such as Control Account or Work Package)
Hours are collected from timesheets interfaced with the scheduleHours are reported through a formal labor accounting system

Actual costs are approximate

  • Blended rates are usually used to convert hours to $
  • Costs are not factored for exempt (salaried) labor
  • Overtime costs may or may not be calculated
Actual costs are usually imported from an accounting system and reconciled
Non-labor costs are usually not recordedBoth labor and non-labor costs are tracked
Differences in ETC / EAC
Resource ManagementPerformance Management
Remaining Work (ETC) is added by resources working on a task

ETC is determined by the responsible manager using a number of factors, including:

  • Resource's estimate of remaining work
  • Performance trends
  • Independent formulas
    • ETC = BAC - BCWP (aka  Budget Cost of Work Remaining (BCWR))
    • ETC = BCWR / CPI (factoring past performance)
  • Risk
  • Remaining scope
  • Known issues
  • Upcoming changes
Differences in Change Management
Resource ManagementPerformance Management
Tasks are added to the schedule as work assignment evolveTasks are added to the schedule in a controlled manner, usually restricted to scope changes and/or planning package conversions
Baselines may or may not be requiredA Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) is required for all scope that is to be measured

If you are implementing Portfolio Management, Resource Management, Performance Management or Earned Value Managment contact Pinnacle.

Categories

Related Pinnacle Services

Related Client Case Studies

Related Software Products

Related Articles